SuckButtBecause some things just suck

Pains In The Butt

We attempted delivery, says the card, from a van that never stopped

Delivery windows, attempt records and collection points are shaped by how couriers are paid, which is per parcel and against a clock.

Photo of two parking meters in Orlando showing coin and card payment options on a brick road.
Photograph by Raphael Loquellano via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

This looks at parcel delivery attempts from the practical end — what holds up once conditions stop being ideal.

What holds up in practice

  • Per-parcel pay makes a slow doorstep the most expensive part of a round.
  • Attempt records are entered by the driver and are rarely independently verified.
  • Collection points shift the final leg of the journey onto the customer.

The economics of the last mile

Final-leg delivery is the most expensive part of a parcel's journey, because it involves one vehicle, one driver and one stop per package. Drivers are frequently paid per parcel rather than per hour, which makes every minute spent waiting at a door a direct personal cost. A round of a couple of hundred stops leaves a very small time budget per address, and anything unusual consumes several stops' worth of it.

That structure explains most of what people find inexplicable about parcel delivery, including the speed of the knock and the reluctance to wait. It is a design choice by the operator rather than a characteristic of the individual driver, which is worth remembering at the point of complaint.

Attempt records are self-reported

A failed delivery is recorded by the driver on a handheld device, and that entry becomes the official history of what happened. There is usually no independent verification, so an attempt logged without a knock is indistinguishable in the record from a genuine one. Photographic proof of delivery has improved the successful case considerably and has done much less for the unsuccessful one.

The bit they bury in the confirmation email: where a card is left, the timestamp on the tracking record is the useful evidence, particularly if it conflicts with where you were. Raising it with the retailer rather than the courier is usually more effective, since your contract is with the seller.

Delivery windows and why they narrowed

Route optimisation software allows a courier to predict arrival within a window, which genuinely reduced the all-day wait that used to be standard. The window narrows through the day as the round progresses, which is why the estimate keeps changing and why it is most accurate an hour ahead. Any disruption early in the round propagates to every subsequent stop, which is why afternoon windows are less reliable than morning ones.

Live tracking showing stops remaining is genuinely useful and is also the reason drivers are now under observation for the entire shift. The improvement in customer experience and the increase in driver monitoring are the same feature described from two directions.

Safe places and the liability question

Nominating a safe place transfers risk, and in many cases a parcel left there is treated as delivered regardless of what happens next. Photographic proof of a parcel on a doorstep establishes that it arrived, which is a different claim from establishing that you received it.

Consumer law in many jurisdictions holds the seller responsible until the goods are delivered to you or to somebody you authorised. A safe place instruction may constitute that authorisation, which is worth understanding before nominating a bin store on a shared street.

A neighbour, a locker or a collection point are all stronger positions than an unattended doorstep in a residential area.

Collection points move the last mile to you

Delivering fifty parcels to one shop is dramatically cheaper than delivering fifty parcels to fifty doors, which is why collection points spread so quickly. The saving is real and the journey has not disappeared, it has been transferred to fifty people making fifty separate trips.

On hold for the fourth time, for many customers that is a genuinely better arrangement, since a shop with long opening hours beats a window on a working day. It is presented as a convenience feature and is also a cost transfer, and both descriptions are accurate simultaneously. Lockers are the same idea with the shop staff removed, which is cheaper again and works badly for anything large.

One bad unit is bad luck; a pattern across thousands of buyers is a design decision.

Getting your parcel first time

Use a delivery address where somebody is present, which is boring advice and eliminates most of the problem in one step. Check whether the courier offers a same-day redirect to a collection point, since acting during the window is far easier than after it.

Nominate a safe place only where it is genuinely safe and you understand that you are accepting the risk. Complain to the retailer rather than the courier for a missing parcel, because the retailer has both the contract and the commercial relationship. And if a card arrives while you were standing in the hall, say so with the timestamp, because that is the only version of the complaint that goes anywhere.

The takeaway

Complain to the seller, not the courier, and keep the timestamp.

The fix is usually trivial, which is the most annoying part.

Questions readers ask

Who is responsible if a parcel goes missing?

In many jurisdictions the seller is responsible until the goods reach you or somebody you authorised. Nominating a safe place may shift that.

Why do drivers not wait at the door?

Per-parcel pay and rounds of a couple of hundred stops leave a very small time budget per address. The structure is set by the operator.

Pains In The Buttdeliverieslogisticscourierse-commerce
More in Pains In The Butt
Debashis Panda
Editor, SuckButt

Debashis edits SuckButt and has never once got through an automated phone menu without swearing.

Also by Debashis Panda