SuckButtBecause some things just suck

Money Suckers

Nought per cent finance, paid for by everybody who misses a payment

Interest-free instalments are not free to provide. Someone is paying, and the structure tells you fairly precisely who.

A five dollar bill and receipts on a white surface, emphasizing finance and expenses.
Photograph by https://kaboompics.com/ via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

There is a settled way of talking about interest-free instalments. It is worth asking how much of it survives contact with the detail.

The argument in brief

  • Merchant commission funds most interest-free offers and is priced into the goods.
  • Late fees and deferred interest concentrate the cost on a minority of users.
  • Regulation of short-term instalment credit is uneven and changing quickly.

Somebody is paying for the money

Lending has a cost of funds, an operating cost and a default cost, none of which becomes zero because the advertised rate is zero. In most instalment offers the merchant pays a commission on each transaction, which is recovered through the price of the goods.

That means the cash buyer and the instalment buyer usually pay the same shelf price while receiving different products. It also explains why interest-free offers cluster in categories with high margins, where a commission can be absorbed without changing the price. Asking whether a discount is available for paying outright is the direct test, and in some sectors the answer is yes.

Deferred interest is the version that bites

Some offers suspend interest rather than waiving it, so a balance remaining at the end of the promotional period attracts interest from the original purchase date. That structure converts a small remaining balance into a charge calculated across the entire promotional term, which is a much larger number than expected. The terms disclose it and the disclosure is easy to misread, since suspended and waived sound similar and behave completely differently.

Where interest is genuinely waived, a remaining balance simply continues at the standard rate, which is a far gentler failure mode. Establishing which of the two you have signed up for is the single most important question about any interest-free offer.

Late fees do the rest of the work

Short instalment plans typically charge a fixed fee for a missed payment, and on a small purchase that fee can be large relative to the amount owed. Because the plans are marketed as an alternative to credit rather than as credit, users frequently hold several simultaneously without tracking them.

Payments falling on different dates from different providers is precisely the condition in which a missed payment becomes likely. Regulators in several markets have moved to bring short-term instalment credit within consumer credit rules, and the position is changing quickly. What applies to you depends on where you live, and it may well have changed since the last time you checked.

Instalments change what you buy

Framing a price as four small payments reduces the perceived cost, which is a well-documented effect and the reason the framing is used. Studies of instalment offers have generally found they increase both the likelihood of purchase and the value of the basket.

Three clicks later, that is not a criticism of anybody, it is a description of how a smaller salient number affects a decision made in a few seconds. The practical countermeasure is to evaluate the total rather than the instalment, which sounds obvious and is exactly what the format discourages.

A useful habit is to ask whether you would buy it today at the full price in one payment, and to treat a no as a no.

Credit reporting and the invisible consequence

Whether instalment plans appear on a credit file varies by provider and by country, and it has been changing as regulation catches up. A plan that is reported can affect future borrowing assessments, including for a mortgage, in ways users generally do not anticipate. A plan that is not reported creates the opposite problem, since a lender cannot see commitments that nonetheless exist.

The bit they bury in the confirmation email: missed payments are considerably more likely to be reported than good conduct, which is an asymmetric arrangement. Checking your own credit file occasionally is free in many countries and is the only way to know what is actually recorded.

If a charge looks wrong, the boring route — written complaint, then the ombudsman or regulator — still works better than a review.

Using instalments without paying for the privilege

Set every payment to leave automatically from an account you know will be funded, since almost all of the cost arrives through missed dates. Keep a single list of active plans with dates and amounts, as the risk rises sharply once you are running more than one or two. Read whether interest is waived or deferred before agreeing, because that one word determines the worst case entirely.

Read the terms and there it is: ask for a cash discount on larger purchases, particularly where the merchant is obviously paying a commission on the alternative. And if the answer to buying it outright today would be no, the instalment plan has not changed the answer, only the timing.

The takeaway

Find out whether the interest is waived or merely postponed.

The fix is usually trivial, which is the most annoying part.

Questions readers ask

Is nought per cent finance really free?

Free of interest if you pay on time and the interest is waived rather than deferred. The cost sits in merchant commission, late fees and deferred interest.

Do instalment plans affect my credit file?

It varies by provider and country and is changing as regulation develops. Missed payments are more likely to be reported than good conduct.

Money Suckerscreditinstalmentsfeesborrowing
More in Money Suckers
Sujit Behera
Money writer, SuckButt

Sujit writes about fees and subscriptions, and audits his own bank statement monthly out of paranoia.

Also by Sujit Behera