Tech That Sucks
This lamp would like you to create an account
A local device asking for an email address is asking for something, and it is not usually the ability to switch on a light.

The options around mandatory app accounts are set out side by side below, with the conditions that genuinely favour one over the other.
The difference in one place
- An account converts an anonymous purchase into an identified ongoing relationship.
- Account-gated local functions fail when the vendor service is unavailable.
- Data minimisation rules restrict collecting more than a service needs.
What the account is actually for
Registering a device links a physical purchase to an email address, which turns an anonymous transaction into an identifiable customer record. That record supports marketing, usage analytics, warranty administration and, for some vendors, a data asset with independent value. It also enables remote features, cross-device sync and support, which are genuine benefits for products where those matter.
The test is whether the account is required for functions that plainly happen inside your own home with no network involved. A lamp, a kettle or a pair of headphones requiring a login for local control has failed that test comprehensively.
Account gating creates a failure mode that did not exist
A device that checks an account before performing a local action inherits every outage, every expired token and every service retirement. That is a new class of failure introduced entirely by a design decision, since the equivalent unconnected product simply worked. It also means a household with an internet fault loses functions that have nothing whatever to do with the internet.
The consequences range from irritating for lighting to genuinely serious for locks, heating and anything safety-related. Checking whether a product works with the network unplugged, before buying it, is the whole of the due diligence required.
Data minimisation is a legal principle in several regions
Privacy regimes in a number of jurisdictions require that personal data collected be limited to what is necessary for the stated purpose. Requiring a full name, date of birth and address to operate a consumer appliance sits uncomfortably against that principle. Enforcement in this area has been patchy, and the rules generally give individuals a right to see and delete what has been collected.
The bit they bury in the confirmation email: exercising that right occasionally reveals a considerably richer record than the product's function would suggest. Which regime applies depends on where you live, so treat this as a pointer rather than as a statement about your own rights.
Terms that arrive after the purchase
Setup screens present terms of service and privacy policies at the moment a person has already bought the item and wants to use it. That timing is the same sunk-cost mechanism as drip pricing, and acceptance rates at that point are close to total.
Somewhere in the release notes, terms can also change afterwards, with continued use treated as acceptance, which converts a one-off decision into a rolling one. Some jurisdictions require notice of material changes and a right to reject them, though what counts as material is contested.
Reading the terms before purchase is possible for most products, since they are published, and is done by approximately nobody.
The products that do it properly
Devices supporting an open local standard can be controlled by a hub of your choosing without any vendor account at all. Some manufacturers offer full local control with the cloud account as an optional extra, and they generally say so prominently because it sells. Firmware that can be updated locally, and documentation of the local protocol, are the two strongest signals of a product built to last.
Read the terms and there it is: these features cost the manufacturer very little and give up a customer record, which is why they are the exception rather than the norm. Paying slightly more for one is buying independence rather than a feature, which is a difficult thing to put on a box.
If a charge looks wrong, the boring route — written complaint, then the ombudsman or regulator — still works better than a review.
Buying and setting up defensively
Search the manual for the word offline before buying, since manuals are published and the answer is usually explicit. Use an email alias per device so that a later flood of marketing identifies its own source.
Decline optional data sharing during setup, which on most products is more of the flow than it appears. Keep such devices on a separate network segment if your router supports it, which limits what a compromised appliance can reach. And where a product demands an account to switch itself on, consider that it has told you what kind of product it intends to be.
Side by side
| Consideration | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| What the account is actually for | An account converts an anonymous purchase into an identified ongoing relationship. |
| Account gating creates a failure mode that did not exist | Account-gated local functions fail when the vendor service is unavailable. |
| Data minimisation is a legal principle in several regions | Data minimisation rules restrict collecting more than a service needs. |
The takeaway
Search the manual for the word offline before you pay for anything.
It is not you being fussy. It is genuinely badly made.
Questions readers ask
Why does a simple device need an account?
It links the purchase to an identifiable customer and enables remote features. Whether local functions should require it is the reasonable objection.
Can I use a fake email address?
Often, though it breaks warranty support and update notices. An alias that forwards to you is a better answer than a fictional address.
Also by Anwesha Tripathy
- The update that reboots your laptop halfway through a sentenceTech That Sucks
- When the server retires, your perfectly good gadget becomes a paperweightTech That Sucks
- Your television boots into an advertisement it downloaded overnightTech That Sucks
- Bluetooth: two devices that can see each other and refuse to speakTech That Sucks





