SuckButtBecause some things just suck

Tech That Sucks

The Cable That Fits The Socket And Will Not Charge

The reversible connector was standardised while the cable behind it was not, so identical-looking leads differ in power negotiation, internal chips and whether they carry data at all.

Overhead view of a stressed woman working at a desk with a laptop, phone, and notebooks.
Photograph by energepic.com via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

Two cables with the same plug on both ends behave completely differently. One charges a laptop, the other trickles into a phone and refuses everything else you try.

The connector was standardised, the cable was not

What was agreed was the physical shape and the pin layout. Everything a cable is capable of carrying was left to a stack of optional specifications sitting on top of that.

A manufacturer can build a fully compliant lead that supports almost nothing, and it will fit every socket perfectly. Compliance is a statement about the plug, not the capability.

The result is a single connector spanning a range of abilities that used to be signalled by having visibly different shapes of plug on the end.

Charging is a negotiation

Before any serious power flows, the charger and the device exchange messages over dedicated configuration pins, agreeing a voltage and a current that both ends can survive.

The cable participates. Resistors inside the plug declare how much current the wire is rated to carry, and the charger will not exceed what the cable has claimed.

A lead declaring a low limit charges slowly no matter how capable the charger and device are. The cable is the constraint, and it is entirely silent about being one.

Higher power needs a chip in the plug

Above a certain current the specification requires an electronically marked cable, containing a small chip that reports its ratings and construction when the charger asks.

Without that chip the system cannot verify the wire is thick enough, so it stays at a conservative default rather than risk pushing heavy current down unknown copper.

Adding the chip and the heavier conductors costs money, so the cheapest leads omit both while looking identical from the outside.

Some leads carry no data at all

Charge-only cables leave out the data conductors entirely. They power a device happily and fail completely at transferring anything, including firmware updates and display output.

Video adds another layer, requiring the high-speed pairs and the ability to switch into an alternate mode, which many otherwise decent cables simply do not implement.

Length compounds it. Resistance rises with distance, and a long thin cable loses enough voltage along the way to drop the negotiated power tier.

Nothing on the outside tells you which one you have

There is no required marking, and voluntary logos appear mainly on the more expensive products, so a drawer of cables is a drawer of unlabelled capabilities.

Users end up doing empirical science, keeping the one good cable near the laptop and cycling the others through increasingly minor duties around the house.

A single connector covering everything from a desk lamp to a monitor was always going to require the differences to hide somewhere. They hid inside the moulding.

Questions readers ask

Why does my headset connect but produce no sound?

Usually the audio output is still routed elsewhere, or the accessory dropped this device from its pairing list. Check the output selector first.

Why do my headphones cut out on the train?

Interference in a crowded 2.4 gigahertz band, made worse by your own body between the phone and the headset. A front pocket helps noticeably.

Tech That Sucksbluetoothaudiowirelesstroubleshooting
More in Tech That Sucks
Anwesha Tripathy
Technology writer, SuckButt

Anwesha writes about software that got worse and interfaces that hide the cancel button.

Also by Anwesha Tripathy