Things That Suck
Your printer has opinions about which ink you are allowed to buy
A cartridge chip is not a fuel gauge. It is an authentication token, and the printer is the bouncer.

What follows is an argument about printer cartridge lockouts, and about where the received version of it stops being true.
The argument in brief
- Cartridge chips authenticate rather than measure, which is why third-party ink can be rejected.
- Printers are frequently sold near or below cost and recovered through consumables.
- Firmware updates have repeatedly changed which cartridges a printer will accept.
The chip is a lock, not a gauge
Most cartridges carry a small chip that the printer interrogates before it will print, and that exchange is an authentication step rather than a measurement. Ink level readings are largely estimated from page coverage counted by the printer itself, which is why a cartridge declared empty frequently still contains ink. Because the chip is the gatekeeper, a physically identical cartridge with an unrecognised chip is refused regardless of what is inside it.
That design is defended on grounds of print quality and warranty protection, and it also happens to make the consumable market exclusive. Both things can be true at once, which is why this argument has run for decades without resolving.
The hardware is the loss leader
A printer sold cheaply with a set of starter cartridges is a razor-and-blade arrangement, where the recurring purchase carries the margin. Starter cartridges are commonly partially filled, so the effective cost of the machine is even lower than the shelf price suggests.
Three clicks later, that model only works if the buyer keeps buying the branded consumable, which is precisely what the authentication chip enforces. It also means the cheapest printer on the shelf is frequently the most expensive one to own over three years. Comparing cost per page rather than purchase price is the single change that makes printer shopping rational.
Firmware updates that change the rules afterwards
Printers connected to a network receive firmware updates, and those updates have on multiple occasions altered which cartridges the machine accepts. A device that worked with a third-party cartridge on Monday can reject it after an update installed silently overnight.
This has attracted regulatory attention and litigation in several jurisdictions, on the basis that the product changed after purchase. The practical defence is to decline automatic firmware updates on a printer, accepting the security trade-off that comes with that choice. A printer with no network connection at all is immune, and is also unable to do most of what it was sold on.
Subscription ink and what it actually buys
Page-based ink subscriptions ship cartridges automatically and charge by pages printed rather than by cartridge, which suits irregular users badly. Unused pages typically roll over only to a capped limit, so an unusually quiet month is partially forfeited. The cartridges are often tied to the plan, which means letting the subscription lapse can leave physically full cartridges that no longer print.
That is the part worth reading carefully, because it converts a service you can cancel into hardware you cannot use.
For high, steady volumes the arithmetic can genuinely favour the subscription, and for everyone else it very often does not.
The tank printers changed the argument
Refillable tank printers sell at a much higher purchase price and dramatically lower running cost, which inverts the razor-and-blade model openly. They exist largely because the aftermarket cartridge trade had already eroded the consumable margin in some markets.
Once the introductory rate lapses, for anyone printing more than a few hundred pages a year the total cost usually favours the tank machine substantially. The trade-off is that the print head is often integrated and not user-replaceable, so a clogged head can end the machine. Printing something in colour once a month is the cheapest maintenance available and prevents most of those failures.
Buying a printer you will not resent
Look up the cost of a full set of cartridges before looking at the printer price, and multiply by your realistic annual usage. Check whether the model has a history of firmware changes affecting third-party consumables, because that history is a good predictor. Prefer a machine with separate colour cartridges, since a combined colour cartridge is discarded whole when one colour runs out.
On hold for the fourth time, a monochrome laser is the correct answer for most households, because toner does not dry out during the eleven months nobody prints anything. The best printer for occasional use is frequently the print shop down the road, which is an answer nobody in the industry wants stated plainly.
The takeaway
Price the ink first, then decide whether you want the printer attached to it.
None of this is an accident. Somebody drew this flow and somebody approved it.
Questions readers ask
Are third-party cartridges bad for the printer?
Quality varies and a leaking cartridge can genuinely damage a head. Reputable remanufacturers are generally fine, and warranty terms differ by jurisdiction.
Why does my cartridge say empty when it clearly is not?
Levels are estimated from counted page coverage, not measured. The reading is a prediction, and a conservative one.
Also by Lopamudra Nayak
- The extended warranty is sold at the till for a reasonThings That Suck
- Same box, same price, less crisps: a short history of the shrinking packetThings That Suck
- Self-checkout: unexpected labour in the bagging areaThings That Suck
- The resort fee for a resort you did not want to be atThings That Suck





