SuckButtBecause some things just suck

The Internet Sucks

Why You Cannot Find The Thing You Saw Last Week

Feeds are generated fresh for each visit rather than stored, ranking shifts constantly, and in-app search is weak, so nothing in the system is built for retrieval.

A neat workspace featuring a laptop displaying Google search, a smartphone, and a notebook on a wooden desk.
Photograph by Caio via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

You saw something useful in a feed, did not save it, and now it is gone. Scrolling back does not work, and search returns everything except the thing you want.

A feed is generated, not stored

What you scrolled through was assembled at the moment you opened the app, from a pool of candidate items ranked by a model against your profile at that instant.

It was never a page that existed somewhere. There is no stable version of it to return to, because it was constructed for one session and discarded afterwards.

Two people opening the same app at the same second see different sequences, and so do you five minutes later.

Ranking shifts constantly

Scores depend on recency, on what has been popular in the last hour, on what you have interacted with since, and on parameters that change without announcement.

An item that ranked well on Tuesday can drop far out of reach by Thursday, not because anything happened to it but because everything around it moved.

The system is optimised for what to show next, which is a different problem from what was shown before, and only one of those is being solved.

Search inside apps is deliberately weak

Indexing every short post from every account for full-text retrieval is expensive, and the demand for it is a small fraction of the demand for the feed.

Most in-app search is therefore tuned to find accounts, hashtags and popular items rather than to locate one specific thing you half remember.

Video and image posts make it worse, since the searchable text may amount to a caption, and the substance of the item is not text at all.

Your history is not a record of what you saw

Activity logs generally record what you acted on, so likes, comments and saves are retrievable while the far larger volume of things you merely read is not.

Some platforms keep a viewing history, often limited in depth and awkward to search, and it is rarely the first place anyone thinks to look.

The asymmetry is deliberate. Storing every impression for every user is a large expense with no direct benefit to the service.

Nothing is built for retrieval

The web once had stable addresses, chronological archives and pages that stayed put, which made finding something again a matter of navigation.

Feed-based platforms replaced navigation with recommendation, which is better at filling time and considerably worse at answering a specific question.

The practical consequence is that anything you might want twice has to be captured the first time, by you, because the platform is not holding it for you.

Questions readers ask

How do I tell if a page is filler?

Check whether any sentence makes a claim that could be wrong. Restated questions, unsourced numbers and answers buried at the end are the common markers.

Are search operators still worth learning?

Yes. Site restriction, date filtering and exact-phrase matching all still work and bypass a great deal of the ranked page.

The Internet Suckssearchcontentpublishingquality
More in The Internet Sucks
Jhilik Mahapatra
Contributing writer, SuckButt

Jhilik writes about everyday irritations and believes packaging is a conspiracy.

Also by Jhilik Mahapatra