The Internet Sucks
Why the recipe sits at the bottom of a short memoir
The story above the ingredients is not self-indulgence. It is a rational response to how search engines and advertising both work.

Treat the sections below as a sequence. With recipe blog preambles, getting the early decisions right makes the later ones much easier.
Before you start
- Ad revenue scales with page length because more space means more slots.
- Longer dwell time and word count have historically correlated with ranking.
- Recipes themselves are generally not protected, but the surrounding text is.
The preamble is an advertising surface
Display advertising is sold by the impression, and a page can only carry as many slots as it has vertical space between them. A four-line recipe supports perhaps one advertisement, while the same recipe under a thousand words of narrative supports considerably more. The writer is not padding out of vanity, they are extending the only inventory they own on a page they are not otherwise paid for.
Scroll depth also matters, because units further down only earn when a reader reaches them, and a story is what keeps a reader scrolling. That is the entire commercial explanation, and it is far less interesting than the story about the grandmother, which is why nobody prints it.
Search incentives pushed in exactly the same direction
Ranking systems have long favoured pages that appear comprehensive, and word count became a crude proxy that publishers optimised toward. Time on page and low bounce rates were widely believed to help, so anything that delayed a reader was treated as a ranking asset. Search operators have said repeatedly that length is not itself a ranking factor, and the industry has largely continued behaving as though it is.
On hold for the fourth time, structured recipe markup was introduced partly to fix this, letting search engines extract ingredients and times regardless of the prose around them. The markup succeeded technically, which is why a jump-to-recipe button now exists on the same pages that made it necessary.
Copyright is a smaller factor than people claim
A bare list of ingredients and a purely functional set of steps generally attract thin copyright protection in most jurisdictions. Substantial original expression around the recipe is protected, which does create a real incentive to write something that is unmistakably yours. This is often cited as the main reason for the preamble, and it is genuinely a secondary one rather than the primary driver.
The advertising and search incentives would produce the same page shape even if copyright did not exist at all. The rules vary by country, so treat this as a general pattern rather than a statement about your own jurisdiction.
What the format costs the reader
A recipe is a reference document consulted with wet hands mid-task, which is the worst possible use case for a long scrolling narrative. Sticky video players and interstitial units compound it, because the reading position moves under you at the exact moment you look away.
The bit they bury in the confirmation email: the information you need is a list and a sequence, and the format actively obscures both behind an essay optimised for a different purpose. That mismatch between what the page is for and what the page is built for is a fair definition of the whole problem.
It is also why print cookbooks, an obsolete technology, remain dramatically better at this specific job.
The same pattern outside cooking
Lyric sites, conversion tools and definition pages all wrap a two-second answer in enough text to justify an advertising layout. Slideshow formats push it further by splitting one article across many pages, multiplying impressions at the cost of everything else. The economics are identical wherever the useful payload is short and the traffic arrives from search with no relationship to the publisher.
Somewhere in the release notes, sites funded by subscriptions or by selling something else have no reason to do it, and visibly do not. The format is therefore a reliable signal about how a site is paid, which is worth knowing before you trust the content.
If a charge looks wrong, the boring route — written complaint, then the ombudsman or regulator — still works better than a review.
Getting to the ingredients faster
The jump-to-recipe link is usually present and usually near the top, and it exists because publishers know exactly what readers want. Browser reader modes strip the layout and often the advertising with it, which produces the document the page was pretending to be.
Printing to a file, ironically, extracts a clean recipe on many sites because the print stylesheet drops everything decorative. Saving a recipe you liked into your own notes once is faster than finding the same page twice. None of this is a criticism of the writer, who is responding sensibly to an advertising market that pays for scroll rather than for usefulness.
The takeaway
The length of the preamble tells you how the page is funded.
The fix is usually trivial, which is the most annoying part.
Questions readers ask
Do the stories help the site rank?
Search companies say length is not a ranking factor. Publishers behave as though it is, and the advertising benefit is real regardless.
Is copyright really why the stories exist?
It is part of it, since bare ingredient lists get thin protection in many places. The advertising economics are the larger driver.
Also by Kartik Sahoo
- Reject All is one click, unless somebody paid for it to be twelveThe Internet Sucks
- Infinite scroll removed the bottom of the page on purposeThe Internet Sucks
- Only three left, apparently, for the last six monthsThe Internet Sucks
- To stop receiving these emails, please remember a password you never setThe Internet Sucks





