SuckButtBecause some things just suck

The Internet Sucks

The Advertisement That Follows You After You Bought It

Retargeting works from list membership rather than knowledge, so a purchase that never reports back leaves you inside an audience that expires on a timer, not on an event.

A neat workspace featuring a laptop displaying Google search, a smartphone, and a notebook on a wooden desk.
Photograph by Caio via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

You buy a kettle. For the next fortnight the internet shows you that kettle, on every site, with the persistence of someone who has not been told the news.

Retargeting works from list membership

A visit to a product page adds an identifier to an audience list held by an advertising platform. That list is the entire basis of what you are subsequently shown.

The system does not know what you want, or what you already own. It knows a browser matching a stored identifier appeared on a page tagged with a particular product.

Everything downstream is set arithmetic performed on those lists. Nothing in the mechanism holds any concept of a satisfied customer.

The purchase signal often never arrives

Removing you requires a confirmation event firing on the page shown after payment, and that page is frequently on a different domain owned by a payment provider.

Tracking prevention in browsers, consent choices, blockers and plain misconfiguration all interrupt that signal, while the original page view that added you was recorded perfectly.

The asymmetry is the whole story. Joining the list is easy and happens early, while leaving it depends on a fragile event at the end of a long chain.

Lists expire on a clock, not on an event

Audiences carry a membership window, commonly measured in weeks. Once you are in, you stay in until the timer runs out, whatever you happen to do in the meantime.

Longer windows are popular because they are cheap and they catch slow decisions. Shorter ones cost reach, and reach is the thing campaign reports reward most visibly.

So the campaign keeps paying to reach someone who has finished, because the window was chosen for the average shopper rather than for you.

Suppression is optional and nobody owns it

Excluding recent buyers is entirely possible. It requires building a purchaser audience, maintaining it, and subtracting it from every active campaign that might otherwise reach those people.

That is fiddly setup work whose benefit appears as slightly lower spend rather than as a visible win, which is not the sort of task that gets prioritised.

Add frequency caps that apply per platform rather than per person, and one product can chase you across several services that are each individually behaving quite moderately.

The advertiser is not obviously losing

Attribution generally credits a conversion to the last advertisement seen beforehand, which means adverts shown to people already intending to buy look extraordinarily effective.

Retargeting audiences are, by construction, made of people with demonstrated interest. Reaching them is cheap and the reported returns are excellent.

The measurement system therefore rewards the behaviour that annoys you most, and will keep rewarding it for as long as credit is assigned that way.

Questions readers ask

How do I tell if a page is filler?

Check whether any sentence makes a claim that could be wrong. Restated questions, unsourced numbers and answers buried at the end are the common markers.

Are search operators still worth learning?

Yes. Site restriction, date filtering and exact-phrase matching all still work and bypass a great deal of the ranked page.

The Internet Suckssearchcontentpublishingquality
More in The Internet Sucks
Jhilik Mahapatra
Contributing writer, SuckButt

Jhilik writes about everyday irritations and believes packaging is a conspiracy.

Also by Jhilik Mahapatra